It is a general guide for crafting stand-out conference paper abstracts.

It is a general guide for crafting stand-out conference paper abstracts.

So you should answer the phone call for Papers? It includes tips for this content and presentation associated with the abstract, along with types of the very best abstracts submitted into the 2012-2013 abstract selection committee when it comes to ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.

Typically, an abstract describes the subject you would like to present during the conference, highlighting your argument, evidence and contribution to your literature that is historical. Most commonly it is limited to 250-500 words. The phrase limit can be challenging: some graduate students do not fret within the limit that is short hastily write and submit an abstract in the last second, which regularly hurts their chances of being accepted; other students try to condense the Next Great American Novel into 250 words, which can be equally damning. Graduate students who approach the abstract early, plan accordingly, and carefully edit are those most frequently invited to present their research. If you are intimidated because of the project, don’t be – the abstract is a fairly standardized type of writing. Stick to the guidelines that are basic and steer clear of common pitfalls and you’ll greatly improve your abstract.

Diligently follow all style that is abstract formatting guidelines. Most CFPs will specify page or word length, as well as perhaps some layout or style guidelines. Some CFPs, however, will list very specific restrictions, including font, font size, spacing, text justification, margins, simple tips to present quotes, just how to present authors and works, whether to include footnotes or otherwise not. Be sure that you strictly stick to all guidelines, including submission instructions. If a CFP will not provide abstract style and formatting guidelines, it is generally appropriate to stay around 250 words – abstract committees read a lot of these things and never look fondly on comparatively long abstracts. Be sure that you orient your abstract topic to deal with any specific CFP themes, time periods, methods, and/or buzzwords.

Be Concise

With a 250-500 word limit, write only what exactly is necessary, avoiding wordiness. Use active voice and pay attention to excessive phrasing that is prepositional.

Plan your abstract carefully before writing it. A abstract that is good address the following questions: what’s the historical question or problem? Contextualize your topic. What exactly is your thesis/argument? It should be original. What is your evidence? State forthrightly you are using source material that is primary. So how exactly does your paper squeeze into the historiography? What’s going on in neuro-scientific study and exactly how does your paper contribute to it? Why does it matter? We know this issue is essential for you, why should it is important to the abstract selection committee?

You should be as specific as you are able to, avoiding overly broad or statements that are overreaching claims. And that is it: don’t get sidetracked by writing an excessive amount of narrative or over explaining. Say what you ought to say and nothing more.

Keep your audience in your mind. How background that is much give on an interest depends on the conference. Could be the conference an over-all humanities conference, a general graduate student history conference, or something like that more specific like a 1960s social revolutions conference? Your pitch should always be suitable for the specificity for the conference: the more specific the subject, the less background that is broad have to give and vice versa.

Revise and edit your abstract to ensure its presentation that is final is free. The editing phase is also the time that is best to visit your abstract as a whole and chip away at unnecessary words or phrases. The final draft should be linear and clear also it should read smoothly. If you’re tripping over something while reading, the selection that is abstract will as well. Ask another graduate student to see your abstract to ensure its clarity or attend a Graduate Student Writing Group meeting.

Your language should be professional as well as your style should stick to standards that are academic. Contractions may be appealing because of the word limits, nevertheless they must certanly be avoided. If citation guidelines are not specifically given, it is appropriate to utilize the author’s name and title of work (in a choice of italics or quotation marks) in the text rather than use footnotes or in-text citations.

Misusing Questions

While one question, if really good, may be posed in your abstract, you should avoid writing more than one (maybe two, if really really good). When you do pose a question or two, make certain you either answer it or address why the question matters to your conference paper – unless you are posing an evident rhetorical question, you must never just let a question hang there. Too many questions takes up too much space and leaves less room so that you could develop your argument, methods, evidence, historiography, etc. quite often, posing a lot of questions leaves the abstract committee wondering if you are planning to address one or all in your paper and in case you even comprehend the answers for them. Remember, you aren’t anticipated to have previously written your conference paper, but you are anticipated to own done enough research that you are prepared to talk about a certain topic you could adequately cover in 15-20 minutes. Demonstrate that you have inked so.

Language that helps you be as specific as you can in presenting your argument is excellent but don’t get your readers bogged down in jargon. They’ll certainly be reading plenty of abstracts and will not desire to wade through the unnecessary language. Keep it simple.

When students repeat claims, they often don’t realize they are doing so. Sometimes this happens because students are not yet clear to their argument. Consider it even more and then write. In other cases, students write carelessly plus don’t proofread. Make certain each sentence is exclusive and therefore it plays a role in the flow of the abstract.

The abstract committee does not need to be reminded associated with grand sweep of history to be able to contextualize your topic. Place your topic specifically within the historiography.

The samples below represent the five highest scoring samples submitted into the selection committee for the ninth annual graduate student history conference, 2012-2013. Two of this samples below were subsequently selected for publication when you look at the NC State Graduate Journal of History. Outstanding papers presented at the graduate student history conference are recommended for publication by panel commentators. Papers go through a peer review process before publication.